Category:Digital Elevation Models: Difference between revisions

Introduction

The digital height models in WindPRO are based on many different national and global sources. The best globally-available DHM source remains the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data - in its 1-arc-second resolution, but more countries are releasing national data under open-data licenses. Typically these have a much better resolution than SRTM - and it is often recommended to use local sources for DEM modelling - if such higher-quality are available for a particular site.

Let us know!

EMD and the windPRO team are continuously working to add better and higher quality DEMs into the data-services of windPRO. So: Please let us know if you know of data-sources that you would like to see included in windPRO. Just drop us an email at support@emd.dk.

Considerations

When using the remote sensing digital height models, you must manually consider the accuracy of the dataset used. This is especially important in the vicinity of the wind farm and other associated objects such as meteorological masts, noise and shadow receptors and photomontage viewpoints. Typically – when applying remote sensing DEMs - the height contour lines must be validated against a local topographical map. In addition, many of the wiki-pages in here provide links to further documentation and an overview of vertical and horizontal acurracy.

What type of elevation model? DEM, DSM and DTM?

For wind energy applications, it is important to understand if the elevation model is a DEM, DSM or a DTM - so if objects (like buildings or trees) have been included in the model. In windPRO we use the following abbreviations when dealing with DEMs.

1. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) - Is often used as a generic term for both DSMs and DTMs.
2. DSM (Digital Surface Model) - Is a surface representation with objects.
3. DTM (Digital Terrain Model) - Is the bare earth representation without objects.

Recommendations

A study on DEM quality by EMD - "High Fidelity Elevation Models - What is the Value in Microscale Modelling" was presented at the WindEurope Wind Resource Workshop in Brussels 2019 (see pdf - here). Main recommendations from this study - concerning the use of DEMs in a wind resource modelling framework - were:

Do not use (or take special care when using)

• SRTM3 - 90m data (use SRTM1 - 30m data instead)
• EU-DEM - 30m data (at least, check accuracy from validation report in the country you are in - and if >60 degrees north).

Consider especially

• Complex terrain areas (steep slopes) – DEM accuracy is worse here
• Always validate vertical mast location
• Use DEMs with 30m resolution or preferably below (at 5 - 10m)
• Look for spikes and anomalities
• To address DEM-uncertainties: Start using NASADEM, AW3D30 and MERIT-DEM as supplement to SRTM1 (for AW3D30 and NASADEM: Check the quality mask first).

Uncertainties from DEMs can be mitigated by

• Using high quality local DEMs
• Use DEMs from local ordnance survey (if vertical/horizontal acurracy is 'better')
• Use DEMs from high-resolution satellite sources (such as Euro-Maps 3D or similar)
• Use DEMs made from local aerial / drone survey
• Use multiple DEMs from different sources